What we prove
No receipt, no clean claim.
BOUNDA proves the gap between a declared decision and downstream reality. It does not invent certainty when receipts are missing.
| Evidence available | Allowed conclusion | Blocked conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Decision log only | Signal / WATCH / scoping | Clean HELD or proven financial loss |
| Decision + partial downstream receipts | UNKNOWN or WATCH with missing evidence list | False certainty |
| Decision + sufficient receipts + zero units | HELD on the verified scope | Claims outside scope |
| Decision + sufficient receipts + positive unit | BREACHED with unit ledger | Final loss without finance receipts |
| Fees, settlement, reconciliation | Stronger financial exposure statement | Claims not supported by reconciliation |
HELD
Sufficient receipts show zero forbidden unit on the verified boundary.
BREACHED
A forbidden unit was observed after the decision.
WATCH
A signal or gap exists, but receipts are not complete enough for a clean claim.
UNKNOWN
The evidence is insufficient. BOUNDA says so explicitly.
Proof is useful because it is bounded.
Each Evidence Pack includes limits and scope so audit, legal, finance and CTO teams know exactly what can be said.
Prepare safe data intake →