Home / Compare
Why BOUNDA is different
Not SIEM. Not audit. Not a guardrail. BOUNDA proves whether the decision held.
Existing tools are valuable. They just answer different questions. BOUNDA closes the gap between declared decision and observed consequence.
| Category | What it optimizes | Question it usually cannot close alone | BOUNDA answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAM / access governance | Who should access what. | Did revoked access truly disappear everywhere? | Check tokens, roles, sessions and downstream provider receipts. |
| Policy engine | Allow / deny decisions. | Did anything happen after DENY? | Proof of consequence absence or breach. |
| SIEM / observability | Collecting and searching logs. | Does the log match provider reality? | Decision-to-receipt reconciliation and Evidence Pack. |
| AI guardrail | Blocking unsafe agent actions. | Did the rejected action still call tools, write memory or burn tokens? | NoToolCall / NoMemoryWrite / CostDelta certificate. |
| Cloud security / DLP | Configuration, exposure, alerts. | Did denied export create a URL, copy, token or replica? | Provider Receipt Matrix and Boundary Certificate. |
| Manual audit | Reconstruction and reports. | Can a third party replay the proof without trusting the vendor? | Manifest, SHA-256, Merkle root, external verifier. |
Positioning line
Your stack tells you what should happen. BOUNDA proves what became real.
Use your existing exports
BOUNDA starts from decision logs, SIEM exports, provider receipts, webhooks, ledgers and audit files.
Keep the boundary honest
No receipt, no HELD claim. Missing evidence becomes UNKNOWN or WATCH, never marketing certainty.
Turn proof into a ritual
First Evidence Close reveals the truth. Monthly Evidence Close keeps proof fresh.
Compare on one real boundary.
Bring the logs you already have. BOUNDA shows what is missing to prove the NO.